Skip to main content

Your buyers are asking AI. Are you the answer?

Find out with OptimizeCamp →

Academic Literature Review

Pro

Systematic literature review for research projects

AcademicReview

About the Academic Literature Review Prompt Template

This research template assigns the AI the role of an academic researcher specializing in systematic reviews and meta-analysis, so the prompt it builds is framed by genuine subject-matter expertise rather than a generic request.

What it does: Conduct a literature review on your research topic focusing on your research question.

You fill in 6 fields (5 required, 1 optional), and SurePrompts assembles a complete, structured prompt you can paste straight into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

Conduct thorough research and analysis with AI-powered research templates and summaries.

How to Use This Template

  1. 1

    Fill in Research Topic

    e.g., Machine learning in healthcare

  2. 2

    Fill in Research Question

    e.g., How does ML improve diagnostic accuracy?

  3. 3

    Fill in Review Scope

    Enter the review scope for your prompt.

  4. 4

    Fill in Disciplines to Include

    e.g., Computer Science, Medicine, Engineering

  5. 5

    Fill in Key Authors/Papers

    Known important works in the field

  6. 6

    Fill in Review Type

    Enter the review type for your prompt.

  7. 7

    Copy your prompt

    Click the copy button to copy your generated prompt, then paste it into your preferred AI tool.

Template Fields

Every field below maps to a part of the finished Academic Literature Review prompt. Required fields shape the core request; optional fields add detail and control.

Research TopictextRequired

A required input that takes a short line of text.

Example: e.g., Machine learning in healthcare

Research QuestiontextRequired

A required input that takes a short line of text.

Example: e.g., How does ML improve diagnostic accuracy?

Review ScopeselectRequired

A required input that takes one option from a list. Choose from 4 preset choices.

Available choices:

Last 5 yearsLast 10 yearsAll timeCustom range
Disciplines to IncludemultilineRequired

A required input that takes a longer, multi-line value.

Example: e.g., Computer Science, Medicine, Engineering

Key Authors/Papersmultiline

An optional input that takes a longer, multi-line value.

Example: Known important works in the field

Review TypeselectRequired

A required input that takes one option from a list. Choose from 4 preset choices.

Available choices:

Narrative ReviewSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisScoping Review
Use This Template

This is a Pro template. Upgrade to access.

Related Resources

Blog Post

Which AI Model for Data Analysis and Spreadsheets in 2026

GPT-5.6 Sol wins data analysis in 2026 — its sandbox runs real pandas on your CSV/Excel for verified numbers. Switch to Gemini 3.1 Pro for huge data, Opus 4.8 to narrate.

Blog Post

The Anatomy of a Failing AI Prompt: Where the Missing 80 Points Go

We scored 1,324 real prompts and traced every lost point. The average loses 78 of 100 — and three fixes (structure, role, length) recover more than half.

Blog Post

People Write Better Prompts for Claude Than for ChatGPT (We Scored 1,324)

We scored 1,324 real prompts by the AI they were written for. Claude users' prompts score 42% higher than ChatGPT users' — but every model's users are failing.

Blog Post

The State of AI Prompting 2026: The Average Prompt Scores 21.8/100

We scored 1,324 real AI prompts on 8 dimensions. The average scored 21.8/100, 89% never assign a role, and engineering them lifted quality 262%.

Related Templates

Executive Summary

Distill complex information into clear executive briefs

FAQ Generator

Generate comprehensive FAQs from content

Competitive Analysis

Analyze competitors and market positioning

Data Analysis Summary

Transform raw data into actionable insights